Immediate postpartum assessment of the anal sphincter by endovaginal ultrasound: An experimental study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries are frequently missed and carry a significant risk for the development of anal incontinence. Immediate postpartum endoanal ultrasound increases identification of these injuries but is rarely employed. We hypothesize that endovaginal ultrasound could be a feasible and easily available alternative sonographic tool to improve early diagnosis of anal sphincter tears. METHODS: We conducted a prospective experimental study including 160 primiparous women. Shortly after vaginal delivery, patients underwent clinical and sonographic perineal examinations. We analyzed the feasibility of anal sphincter assessment by endovaginal ultrasound and its potential contribution in the early diagnosis of anal sphincter injuries. RESULTS: Sonographic assessment of the anal sphincter was analyzable for 136 patients (85.0%). Causes of non-analyzability included air artifacts (6.9%), lack of distinction between the external anal sphincter and surrounding tissues (9.4%) and distortion artifacts (9.4%). Patients in the non-analyzable ultrasound subgroup were less likely to have delivered in a dorsal lithotomy position (62.5% vs. 85.3 %) and more likely to have had an episiotomy (33.3% vs. 14.0%), and their risk of sphincter injury was more frequently classified as "improbable" on clinical examination (91.7% vs. 61.0%). Ultrasounds were analyzable for 96.4% of patients clinically reported as having "possible" or "certain" sphincter injuries. The incidence of anal sphincter injury was 16.9% for clinical observation and 20.0% with associated sonographic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Endovaginal ultrasound could be used as a complementary tool in assessment of the anal sphincter in high-risk patients. Its feasibility and easy availability make this technique a promising tool for improving the management of anal sphincter tears.

Immediate postpartum assessment of the anal sphincter by endovaginal ultrasound: a new technical approach.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In this study we described a new technical approach to adapt endovaginal ultrasound scanning of the anal sphincter complex to the immediate postpartum period. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical and ultrasonographic examinations of 18 primiparous women presenting deep perineal tears with potential or clearly identified lesions of the anal sphincter. Potential anal sphincter lesion was defined as a second degree perineal tear extending close to the anal sphincter with exposition of its capsule or muscular fibers. We reported interesting ultrasonographic images explaining our technique in a video. RESULTS: We reported clinical and ultrasonographic features in nine cases of grade 2, four cases of grade 3a, four cases of grade 3b and one case of grade 3c perineal tears. The ultrasonographic examination confirmed the intact state of the anal sphincter complex in all patients with clinical grade 2 tears except one in which a grade 3b lesion was detected. We were not able to identify external anal sphincter lesions on ultrasound in any of the patients with clinical grade 3a tears. In patients with clinical grade 3b tears, the ultrasound confirmed the external anal sphincter lesion in all cases, but revealed additional involvement of the internal anal sphincter in 1 case (grade 3c). CONCLUSION: Immediate postpartum endovaginal ultrasound could be a promising technique to improve the management of perineal traumas after vaginal delivery.

Do recent immigrants have similar obstetrical care and perinatal complications as long-term residents? A retrospective exploratory cohort study in Brussels.

PURPOSE: Recent immigrants (RIs) face various barriers affecting quality of care. The main research question assessed whether perinatal complications (during pregnancy, labour, delivery and neonatal period) were similar in RIs to those in long-term residents (LTRs). The secondary question assessed whether prenatal and perinatal care was similar in the two groups. METHODS: This is a monocentric observational study, carried out in Brussels between November 2016 and March 2017 (n=1365). We surveyed 892 pregnant women during prenatal consultations and immediate postpartum period in order to identify RIs of less than 3 years (n=230, 25%) and compared them with LTRs (n=662). Sociodemographic data, baseline health status, prenatal care, obstetrical and neonatal complications were compared between these two groups. Multivariable binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the occurrence of perinatal complications (during pregnancy, labour and delivery, and neonatal period) between RIs and LTRs after adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: RIs were living more frequently in precarious conditions. RIs were younger (p<0.001) and had a lower body mass index (p<0.001) than LTRs. Prenatal care was often delayed in RIs, resulting in fewer evaluations during the first trimester (p<0.001). They had a lower prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (p<0.05) and less complications during the pregnancy even after adjustment for confounding factors. Similar obstetrical care during labour and delivery occurred. After adjustment for confounding factors, no differences in labour and delivery complications were observed. Although RIs' newborns had a lower umbilical cord blood pH (<0.05), a lower 1 min of life Apgar score (p<0.01) and more frequently required respiratory assistance (p<0.05), no differences in the composite endpoint of neonatal complications were observed. No increase in complications in the RI group was detected whatever the considered period. CONCLUSION: RIs had less optimal prenatal care but this did not result in more obstetrical and perinatal complications.